We don't know what she learned or read about or what the other orphans told her there. Jennifer was a pretty young girl while at the orphanage, and she had no memories prior to being with Gregory. I'm afraid to say so, but it's not like when you convinced me about Gregory's innocence (I was blind -.-). 'free'.Īnyway, this IS a theory, but about my 'Hoffman = Pedophile' theory. I think that's because she had to realize she was. She went away only a bit after Hoffman went away. She wanted to remain in the orphanage with him, in spite of everything. I also think Clara, because of what she endured since she was a child, felt a sort of twisted love for Hoffman. Maybe too singular (This one's better).Īnd that's not all. I repeat, and I hope I'm not boring you, that certain images are not the result of a mental association, just because they're too. I think your example about Clara and Hoffman is right, but we're talkin' about 'images'. Too many clues for a big mental allucination.

Thinking that the image/memory of something wrote usually is not modified by the mind - I talked with a psychologist about this fact :° - would you really think that it was just because he was worried about her ? :°°°). But why would she have associated the image of a professor, even if he's strict professor, to that of a pedophile ? She was afraid of him, of course, because of his severity but the way he treated Clara (Well, Clara was the nurse, why would he have ordered her to clean in the Sick Room in front of him, locking the door ?), the way he touched Diana (And that's not a case if they're the older girls), what he wrote in his diary (Oh, come on.

Doesn't this thing seems too like a constrainment to you ? The way Hoffman touched Diana, the way he touched Jennifer herself during the boss battle (Although I know that he never cared about Jennifer in THAT sense), could they all be a blur ? She filled the holes in her mind, maybe.

Rule of rose hoffman